The ethics of scientific publications

Edition
  • decision to publish the article solely on the basis of expert independent reviewers and opinions of the members of the editorial Board;
  • according to confidential information about a submitted manuscript to only authors and reviewers;
  • removes from consideration of the submitted article if there is a conflict of interest;
  • take appropriate responsive action upon receipt of a complaint of ethical character on the presented manuscript or published article (notification of the author, the discussion of the complaint by the editorial Board, publication, corrections);
  • if necessary, recommendations for citing papers based on their scientific significance, with the aim of improving the material presented.
  • maintains confidentiality and not to disclose information about the submitted manuscripts with third parties, with the exception of the reviewers. Correspondence with the author is confidential;
  • provides awareness of the reviewers about the rules of reviewing;
  • editorial policy to ensure maximum transparency and full reporting to the author; if the process of review and consideration takes more time, the author notified via e-mail;
  • protects the rights of third parties from unauthorized use of content (plagiarism) – persons convicted of plagiarism will lose opportunities for publication in the journal. The editorial Board of the journal on their pages can publicize which became known to it cases of plagiarism;
  • in case of rejection of the manuscript or sending it back for revision the editorial is the authors justifying its decision;
  • doesn't allow to print materials with incorrect links and incorrect borrowings;
  • the editorial Board encourages the authors to improve the quality submitted to the journal through the scientific review and redaction of articles;
  • the editors are obliged to make fair and unbiased decisions independent from commercial interests, and to organize the process of unbiased review.
Author
  • The authors are responsible for the contents of this publication.
  • Researchers should carefully check their publications at all stages to ensure that all of their methods and results are described accurately.
  • The authors should carefully check all calculations, data presentation, formulated their documentation and evidence.
  • Quotes and references to other works must be accurate and neatly decorated.
  • Authors should not copy from other publications references to the work with which they themselves are not familiar.
  • The responsibility for the proper definition of authorship entirely rests with the authors.
Reviewer
  • accepts (reports editor) for review only those manuscripts for which assessment he has enough knowledge and which it can proreagiruete in a timely manner;
  • respects the confidentiality of the review and not reveal any details of a manuscript, or reviews during or after reviewing to anyone except those persons to whom it is allowed by the journal;
  • does not use information obtained in the course of the review, for their own benefit or benefit of other persons or entities or harm to other persons or diskreditieren other persons;
  • does not talk directly to the authors without prior permission of the journal;
  • according to the editors about potential conflicts of interest and seeks advice in the magazine, if he is not sure whether the existing situation is a conflict of interest or not;
  • not allow to the content of the review was influenced by the origin of the manuscript, by the nationality, religious affiliation, political or other views of its sponsors or commercial considerations;
  • writing a review objectively and constructively, refraining from hostile or inflammatory statements, and also from defamatory or derogatory comments.